Posted: 09 Aug 2006 19:59
Ever know anyone who went by the username 2wenty6ix?hypeman wrote:moo
Page 2 of 2
Posted: 09 Aug 2006 21:27
maybe..
no.
no.
Posted: 09 Aug 2006 21:54
sexual!eamon angelface wrote:homopevee wrote:not trying to be gay or anything - but why does this forum need amateur porn
just seems a bit... scummy?
especially when they have spotty firecrotches
Posted: 09 Aug 2006 22:18
Really? You post just like him/her/it.hypeman wrote:maybe..
no.
Posted: 09 Aug 2006 23:44
gulliver wrote:Really? You post just like him/her/it.hypeman wrote:maybe..
a) good thing?
b) bad thing?
c) DIE HYPEMAN!
no.
Posted: 10 Aug 2006 00:19
hypeman wrote: b) bad thing?
c) DIE HYPEMAN!
Posted: 17 Aug 2006 04:50
1. What's wrong with you? Amateur porn is HOT. It's NORMAL people taking dirty pictures, not big famous pornstars with cavernous vaginas. Personally, I prefer to not know the names of the people in my porn, and I'd get tired of seeing the same faces over and over.smash wrote:completely agreed actually. It doesn't need it here...and if it is gonna be here it should be top caliber; which so far I'm horribly disappointed. The fake post, serious' dumb follow the rating, the suicide girls (tats and facial shit, nasty!)pevee wrote:not trying to be gay or anything - but why does this forum need amateur porn
just seems a bit... scummy?
especially when they have spotty firecrotches
Needs more Angelbaby.
As to whether this forum needs it, I continue to leave that to your individual discretion.
2. @ pevee: ever shave your privates? If you see totally bald kitties in pro porn that look like absolutely perfect skin, it's because of really good lighting and digital manipulation. Sometimes razorburn happens, man. Believe you me. Nobody's perfect.
3. Personally I find tats and piercings to be very sexy indeed. To each is own though, but please don't call it nasty! OPEN MIND, dudes.
4. More Angelbaby would be faptastic. <3
Posted: 17 Aug 2006 07:29
I shave my balls and scrotum everyday.thefelinepunk wrote:
2. @ pevee: ever shave your privates? If you see totally bald kitties in pro porn that look like absolutely perfect skin, it's because of really good lighting and digital manipulation. Sometimes razorburn happens, man. Believe you me. Nobody's perfect.
and because I am a genius and not a ginger dirty coppertop bastard!
Mine is as smooth as my circumsized penis.
good day.
Posted: 17 Aug 2006 10:01
thefelinepunk wrote:1. What's wrong with you? Amateur porn is HOT. It's NORMAL people taking dirty pictures, not big famous pornstars with cavernous vaginas. Personally, I prefer to not know the names of the people in my porn, and I'd get tired of seeing the same faces over and over.smash wrote:completely agreed actually. It doesn't need it here...and if it is gonna be here it should be top caliber; which so far I'm horribly disappointed. The fake post, serious' dumb follow the rating, the suicide girls (tats and facial shit, nasty!)pevee wrote:not trying to be gay or anything - but why does this forum need amateur porn
just seems a bit... scummy?
especially when they have spotty firecrotches
Needs more Angelbaby.
As to whether this forum needs it, I continue to leave that to your individual discretion.
2. @ pevee: ever shave your privates? If you see totally bald kitties in pro porn that look like absolutely perfect skin, it's because of really good lighting and digital manipulation. Sometimes razorburn happens, man. Believe you me. Nobody's perfect.
3. Personally I find tats and piercings to be very sexy indeed. To each is own though, but please don't call it nasty! OPEN MIND, dudes.
4. More Angelbaby would be faptastic. <3
Like 90% of amateur porn makes me *yawn*. If I don't know who the girl is (either porn slut, celebrity, or a chick I know in person) I find myself generally disinterested in looking at her...
2. directed at pevee- however I prefer my women to have a little bit of bush. Like just above. I think its a product of my childhood and what was 'in' when I was perving on playboys
3. Tats and piercings are nasty. They always scream 'skanky' to me. Sorry, but thats a fact. (not that they are skanky...that to me, I can't see them any other way). Not very shocking, but Angelbaby and Dex think like I do on that score. Great minds think alike.
4. Angelbaby pics would answer a burning question. Is she a hermaphrodite or just a tranny?
Cuz there's no way a chick can be as cool as she is.Posted: 17 Aug 2006 10:58
smash wrote:Cuz there's no way a chick can be as cool as she is.
That hurts. Right here. *points to heart*
Posted: 17 Aug 2006 11:51
Someone punched your boob?thefelinepunk wrote:That hurts. Right here. *points to heart*
Posted: 17 Aug 2006 12:06
Not recently, but that actually hurts more in the boob area.
Posted: 17 Aug 2006 19:58
I like amateur porn better than the polished porn stars for many reasons. The sticking point is always good photography. If the pic is overexposed, or has too many shadows in the wrong places, or whatever, then it's no good.
However, when you see an amateur posing, it's very often easy to say "wow, she looks like x whose thong is always exposed at work, or v that always wore short skirts to biology class. Porn stars are almost always fake. Fake boobs, fake faces, fake expressions for the camera, fake tans (ick... real tans around the right area are OK, but super dark tanning sessions and/or bottled stuff never looks right). Fake anything doesn't turn me on.
The post above is great, IMHO. Needs more boob exposure, though.
However, when you see an amateur posing, it's very often easy to say "wow, she looks like x whose thong is always exposed at work, or v that always wore short skirts to biology class. Porn stars are almost always fake. Fake boobs, fake faces, fake expressions for the camera, fake tans (ick... real tans around the right area are OK, but super dark tanning sessions and/or bottled stuff never looks right). Fake anything doesn't turn me on.
The post above is great, IMHO. Needs more boob exposure, though.
Posted: 18 Aug 2006 06:19
Ever seen a exclamation mark? Its quite delightful.smash wrote:
2. directed at pevee- however I prefer my women to have a little bit of bush. Like just above. I think its a product of my childhood and what was 'in' when I was perving on playboys
i'm still searching for the hallowed question mark. yum.
Posted: 18 Aug 2006 06:37
Hahaaha. No. And worse, I spent about 3 minutes looking at your comment going...ok..why is he hinting I should have put an exclamation point in? And why is he thinking I need a question mark...when did I ask a question to him.pevee wrote:Ever seen a exclamation mark? Its quite delightful.smash wrote:
2. directed at pevee- however I prefer my women to have a little bit of bush. Like just above. I think its a product of my childhood and what was 'in' when I was perving on playboys
i'm still searching for the hallowed question mark. yum.
And then finally...I got it. I blame the fact that I've had a long week.